Bioplastics
BIOPLASTICS
Understanding what biopolymers are on the market, what questions to ask when sourcing materials, and making sense of the complex use cases of biopolymers.
Types of Polymers
PVOH and PVA (Polyvinyl Alcohol)
- Feedstock
- Virgin Inputs
- Formulation
- Use Case
- End-of-Life
Bio-PE and Bio-PET
- Feedstock
- Virgin Inputs
- Formulation
- Use Case
- End-of-Life
PLA and PBAT
- Feedstock
- Virgin Inputs
- Formulation
- Use Case
- End-of-Life
PBAT: petroleum-based
PBS
- Feedstock
- Virgin Inputs
- Formulation
- Use Case
- End-of-Life
Our Stance: Our preference is for materials that are readily recyclable.
PHA and PHB
- Feedstock
- Virgin Inputs
- Formulation
- Use Case
- End-of-Life
Our Stance: Our preference is for materials that are readily recyclable.
PEF
- Feedstock
- Virgin Inputs
- Formulation
- Use Case
- End-of-Life
Cellophane (Cellulose)
- Feedstock
- Virgin Inputs
- Formulation
- Use Case
- End-of-Life
Polymer Additives
Biodegradability Additives
- Feedstock
- Virgin Inputs
- Formulation
- Use Case
- End-of-Life
Bioplastics Video Recap
Want to learn more?
Our Research
Matrices Recap
We detail what happens if a biopolymer is disposed of in various environments. Of course, it is easy to say that a specific biopolymer is “compostable” or “recyclable.” But to truly get at the “deep” questions that drive why brands are interested in bioplastics, it is critical to explore how materials will behave in all end-of-life situations.
Our Conclusions
WHEN AND HOW TO USE BIOPLASTIC PACKAGING
These questions help create a larger framework for assessing materials. At EcoEnclose, we use a Sustainable Packaging Framework to allow us to do the same fundamental assessment for packaging materials and products that come on the market. That way, we don’t have to research all of the ins and outs of each product to determine whether we support it, use it ourselves, or offer it to our customers.
- Inputs
- Functionality
- End-of-Life
- What is the feedstock (source inputs) for this polymer?
- Is it petroleum-based?
- Is it grown in a degenerative way (i.e.massive monocrops like corn & sugarcane)?
- Could it be created with regenerative inputs or novel waste streams?
- Could it be created in a net-neutral or net positive way?
- Is the feedstock degenerative by nature? In other words, is it net-positive, neutral, or negative in the following categories:
- Land Impact
- What is its land-use?
- Does it require (now or in the future) clear-cutting of critical ecosystems for farming?
- Does it threaten ancient or endangered forests?
- Is it a monocrop?
- Is it planted and grown in a regenerative growth cycle?
- Does it need high levels of petroleum-based fertilizers and pesticides?
- Carbon footprint
- Reliance on petroleum-based products?
- (i.e., polyvinyl acetate, ethylene glycol)
- What is it designed for functionally?
- I.e., thin-film plastics, rigid plastics, agricultural applications, interaction with water, etc.
- Does it behave in the same way as a traditional (petrol-based) plastic, or are there functional drawbacks?
- I.e., shelf life, moisture barriers?
- What is the formulation of the polymer?
- New: A unique formulation that does not try to mimic a traditional petroleum-based plastic.
- Drop-in: Identical on a molecular level to a fossil-fuel based plastic.
- What would make this a better option than recycled plastics?
- What is its intended end of life/waste stream defined by the manufacturer or distributor?
- How accessible to the average consumer is this intended end-of-life waste stream?
- Does this waste stream have the capacity to accept and treat this material at mainstream/high volumes? Does the relevant waste industry want this material?
- Does the technology to effectively treat this material exist widespread?
- (i.e. filtration to capture microplastics or vinyl acetate in wastewater)
- Does the material have the potential to create marine pollution (ocean plastics) or disintegrate into microplastics?
- Is this material circular/closed loop by nature or linear by nature?
- “Circular” meaning, could it be recirculated through recycling or existing systems to be made back into itself, thus closing the loop?
An Ideal Bioplastic
We recognize that there is no bioplastic currently on the market that meets our vision for circularity and our standards for sustainable input materials. So, what would our ideal eCommerce bioplastic be?
Below are the things we look for when it comes to bioplastics. With this framework in mind, as of today, we find that recycled content is still very much superior to any bioplastic material available. However, as EcoEnclose explores use cases where composting is preferred (i.e., food/organics) or where the strength of a virgin plastic polymer is genuinely required, we may find ourselves turning to bioplastic solutions that meet the below framework.
- Inputs
- Functionality
- End-of-Life
- Sourced from regenerative crops or bio feedstocks such as algae and agricultural residue.
- Harvested without risk of endangering important ecosystems or placing pressure on these environments to support a higher and higher growth capacity.
- Carbon neutral or negative. At the very least, it does not require more carbon input than recycled plastic would.
- Meets the needs of eCommerce packaging. Compared to recycled plastic, it does not meaningfully sacrifice shelf-life, strength (tensile), and a range of applications and functions in a way that could lead to excess product damage.
- Able to be readily recycled in existing & accessible streams. Curbside recyclable is preferred.
- Able to be closed-loop by design - the ability to be recycled back into itself.
- Any bioplastic solution designed to dissolve in water should be non-toxic in aquatic environments.